Infrastructure & Highway 65

The Issue

Transportation improvements and existing public infrastructure will influence where East Bethel grows and what kinds of development become possible. Highway 65 is not simply a road project; it is a long-term economic and land-use issue for the city.

My Position

Infrastructure should be used intentionally. Areas served by major transportation and utility investments should carry a larger share of the city’s commercial, industrial, mixed-use, and appropriate higher-density growth. Rural areas should not be urbanized simply because growth pressure exists elsewhere.

What I Would Do as Mayor

  • Coordinate the comprehensive plan with Highway 65 and utility planning.
  • Focus economic-development efforts where infrastructure can support higher-value uses.
  • Evaluate infrastructure extensions against their long-term tax-base return and operating cost.
  • Avoid using public infrastructure as an excuse for citywide suburbanization.
  • Plan early for the business and development opportunities created by improved regional access.

What Success Looks Like

Infrastructure investments that produce a stronger tax base and better local services while helping preserve the rural areas residents chose East Bethel for.

How this connects to the Highway 65 growth strategy

Growth near Highway 65 should be planned as complete, connected communities with enforceable mixed-use and design standards.